Download (1)

Historical Timeline

  • F. H. Vs. Memphis City Schools (6th Circuit)

    F. H. Vs. Memphis City Schools (6th Circuit)
    FH parent recorded suit against school after FH was verbally, physically, and explicitly manhandled by his helpers at school. The school went into Settlement Agreement with the parent, at that point wouldn't respect the Agreement. Court found that Sec. 1983 cases don't require depletion under IDEA and that settlement understanding is enforceable in courts. Case No. 2:12-cv-02312-JTF-cgc.
  • Fry vs. Napoleon Community School District

    Fry vs. Napoleon Community School District
    A school refusal to permit a student service-dog to go with her in school. After the guardians sued, under Sec 504, a government requests court held that the guardians case was banned on the grounds, they neglected to deplete their managerial cures under the IDEA.The courts ruled in favor of the parents from a unanimous decision stating exhausted was not necessary. For this situation, the Frys grievance affirms just inability based segregation making no claims about the disavowal FAPE.
  • Endrew F. vs. Douglas County School District RE-1

    Endrew F. vs. Douglas County School District RE-1
    The guardians contended that their child with mental imbalance did not gain quantifiable ground on his IEP objectives and that the school neglected to address his compounding conduct issues. The guardians upheld for an uplifted 'important instructive advantage' standard. On December 22, 2015, after an unfriendly choice from a government claims court, the guardians mentioned that the Supreme Court settle their instructive advantage question.